copperbadge:

For anyone who’s ever written a high school AU, fifteen year old Steve Rogers and seventeen year old Tony Stark. 

[From Captain America #355, 1989, and Iron Man #s 327-329, 1996.]

tyrianterror:

iamthedukeofurl:

garykingoftheworld:

Ya know something interesting about the Marvel/DC ‘rivalry’ on tumblr?

Everyone acts like DC is this super regressive company compared to Marvel when DC really did more progressive stuff first and is still doing so.

Women as heroes?
DC’s had Wonder Woman as one of their…

There’s a psychological term for this, where basically people react to change rather than the status quo. Somebody who made $35000/Year and just got a $5000/Year raise is going to be happier than somebody who makes $60000/Yr. 

DC had a stronger status quo, but Marvel is making more of an effort to CHANGE that status quo right now. 

The current lionization of Marvel and hatred of DC is just that , current. Right now, Marvel seems more committed to creating comic books that appeal to a diverse audience (Young Avengers, an all-female team getting the unmodified X-Men Title, Black Widow, Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel, She-Hulk), and yes, creating Female Thor and making Sam Wilson take up the shield of Captain America (And with it the role of “Guy in the Marvel Universe who is always right). 

Wonder Woman has been around for seventy years at this point, but that didn’t stop the creation of a comic book culture that is decidedly focused on men, and hostile to women.

What’s more, Marvel is MAKING NOISE about what they are doing. Yes, it’s to drum up publicity and pat themselves on the back for being progressive, but it’s ALSO serving to send a clear message about the future of comic books. Having a parapalegic transwoman pacific islander superhero is great, but it’s not going to change very much if you don’t tell anybody about her. It’s not going to tell  the dudebros who feel they need to protect the sanctity of the hobby by quizzing any girl in a green lantern shirt that they don’t get to put a No Girls Allowed sign outside the clubhouse, and it’s not going to make women and people of color feel more welcome in comic book stores. It’s going to be a curiosity on the shelves that only the Dudebros patrol, and that will run for six issues and get canceled. 

So Marvel is putting on a show, they’re plastering the press with pictures of Kamala Khan and Sam Wilson and whoever the new Thor is. 

DC meanwhile, is whitewashing previously mixed race characters, canceling series involving PoCs, and turning Amanda Waller into another male-gaze baiting supermodel.

Thinking about it, Amanda Waller is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. Marvel, to the best of my knowledge, has never had a character like Amanda Waller. A woman of color, clearly not designed to appeal to the male gaze, who was respected and treated as a force to be reckoned with. 

Props to DC for making Amanda Waller in the past, shame on them for what they’re doing with her now.

We love Marvel because of what Marvel is doing NOW, introducing diversity into comics, and then making a lot of noise about it in order to make non white-cis-male readers feel more welcome. We mock DC because we are looking at their current actions. 

This isn’t a question of the company’s past, it’s a question of what the companies are doing right now, and right now DC is regressing to the white-male-dudebro demographic, while Marvel is loudly and publicly trying to change things. 

Okay, no, hold up. Last response to this was good but, can we just address some more of the shit in the OP?

I am someone who will still say: I prefer DC. DC has all my fave characters that have lived in my heart since I was young. But Marvel is BLOWING THEM OUT OF THE WATER and I really only ever buy new Marvel stuff. If I’m buying DC, it’s old stuff from the old universe.

First off:  the Falcon was the first African-American hero. He proceeded Luke Cage by three years. And he has no criminal history. 

Sorry, that really bugged me. Okay, the Wonder Woman thing. DC /says/ a lot about the golden trinity. But Wondy gets the shit end of the stick. Please don’t pretend this is just about the movie she doesn’t have. It’s the merch she doesn’t have, the cartoon she’s never gotten. Batman’s had multiple cartoons. Superman’s had a cartoon. Wondy…. got to appear in group cartoons. Wow. Good job DC.

And with Milestone, it should probably be mentioned that DC and Milestone didn’t always have a great relationship, from what I understand. But yeah, thank god DC did support them, the things Milestone did were really important for comics. 

You do NOT get to use Beth (Doctor Midnight) and Yolanda (Wildcat) as markers of DC’s ~progressiveness~. Where are they?? Where are their comics??? THEY DON’T HAVE ANY. I love Yolanda so much when I was reading my Dad’s old Infinity Inc comics! And then… I couldn’t find anything with her. Nada. (Who did I find though? Fucking Mr. Bones, stripped of all his hilarious rhyming and made into a boring skeleton character. Uuuuugh.)

Dude, in Marvel, Northstar came out as gay. The X-Men diversified like a series that deals with predjuice SHOULD. Captain Marvel (no, not Carol Danvers, Monica Rambeau, a black woman) actually LED the Avengers. The Runaways were diverse,  like…. diversity was not only happening in DC. It might have been happening at a faster rate, but it happened in Marvel too. What really held them back, imo, was an unwillingness to let characters die/move on and leave their titles to someone else, to let that legacy be carried out.  (And did you REALLY leave out Jaime Reyes from that list? SMH.)

You don’t get to use -RUMOURS- of casting against ACTUAL casting. In reality, in shit DC has actually, definitely done, DC has made Batman and Superman movies. No Wonder Woman. No POC Aquaman. No ‘The Rock’ as Captain Marvel (I am not calling him Shazam. God, that’s such a stupid name, all I see is the asshole wizard in my head. WHAT IS THE WIZARD’S NAME NOW ANYWAYS??) They’ve done movies with white dudes as heroes (maybe one white heroine if we’re counting Catwoman??). Marvel has had POC heroes. Marvel has had female heroes. Marvel could do better but it still wins. You can argue this when DC has actually in reality done something. Or at least confirmed the casting.

DC HAS UNDONE MOST OF WHAT THEY DID BACK IN THE DAY

A bunch of the people you mentioned are AWOL in the nu52! And the previous reply mentioned my ADORED Amanda Waller, and that NEEDS to be addressed. A middle-aged fat woman was changed to be titillating for the straight dudes. A woman that went through hell and then hardened to the point she could put ANYONE ELSE through hell. A woman that fired a machine gun at Granny Goodness. A woman that ran the Suicide Squad with an iron fist. And she just had to be sexified. 

DC ruins it’s own good things.

Marvel lets me be happy with the good things it gives me. And if it restarts everything? It still KEEPS THE OLD UNIVERSE AROUND. And the new one ~~~~makes sense~~~~~! It’s a magical world.

(via derinthemadscientist)

"Regarding single issue sales: they are incredibly important to a lot of Image creators. On Rocket Girl, it’s by far the biggest chunk (of course, we don’t have a tpb yet). And every reader counts. A few thousand copies can make or break a series. If Rocket Girl dips into the 8000s, we’ll start thinking about when to wrap it up. If it stays above 12,000 we can do it forever. At 12,000 copies I can make as much writing Rocket Girl as Hulk; Amy Reeder can make as much penciling/inking/coloring as she would on Batwoman. 8000 vs 12,000 is a significant difference in percentage, but it’s not a huge amount of readers. A lot of Image creators are in the same boat, albeit their individual line might be a bit higher or lower. Certainly collected editions and digital and ancillary media/merchandise contribute as well. But a lot of making creator-owned work is down to financing: and single issues have the biggest impact on cash flow–and the only impact on cash flow for almost a full year when you take into account early production to ‘get ahead’ as well as solicitation. Also: your comment forgets artists, who are forgotten way to much nowadays. A writer can maybe juggle 4 simultaneous projects, but an artist can do just one book at a time. It is much harder for an artist to make the plunge into creator-owned–so consider that when choosing what to support."

Brandon Montclare in comments at The Beat

Reblogging because the economics of creator-owned comics are of interest to me, and because this is the kind of thing I should probably take into account when it comes to who gets their comic pre-ordered, who gets shelf picked, and who gets trade-waited.

(via knitmeapony)

…some of my casual wisdom…

(via bmontclare)

(Source: northstarfan, via scarygoround)

Tags: comics

iamthedukeofurl:

garykingoftheworld:

Ya know something interesting about the Marvel/DC ‘rivalry’ on tumblr?

Everyone acts like DC is this super regressive company compared to Marvel when DC really did more progressive stuff first and is still doing so.

Women as heroes?
DC’s had Wonder Woman as one of their…

There’s a psychological term for this, where basically people react to change rather than the status quo. Somebody who made $35000/Year and just got a $5000/Year raise is going to be happier than somebody who makes $60000/Yr. 

DC had a stronger status quo, but Marvel is making more of an effort to CHANGE that status quo right now. 

The current lionization of Marvel and hatred of DC is just that , current. Right now, Marvel seems more committed to creating comic books that appeal to a diverse audience (Young Avengers, an all-female team getting the unmodified X-Men Title, Black Widow, Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel, She-Hulk), and yes, creating Female Thor and making Sam Wilson take up the shield of Captain America (And with it the role of “Guy in the Marvel Universe who is always right). 

Wonder Woman has been around for seventy years at this point, but that didn’t stop the creation of a comic book culture that is decidedly focused on men, and hostile to women.

What’s more, Marvel is MAKING NOISE about what they are doing. Yes, it’s to drum up publicity and pat themselves on the back for being progressive, but it’s ALSO serving to send a clear message about the future of comic books. Having a parapalegic transwoman pacific islander superhero is great, but it’s not going to change very much if you don’t tell anybody about her. It’s not going to tell  the dudebros who feel they need to protect the sanctity of the hobby by quizzing any girl in a green lantern shirt that they don’t get to put a No Girls Allowed sign outside the clubhouse, and it’s not going to make women and people of color feel more welcome in comic book stores. It’s going to be a curiosity on the shelves that only the Dudebros patrol, and that will run for six issues and get canceled. 

So Marvel is putting on a show, they’re plastering the press with pictures of Kamala Khan and Sam Wilson and whoever the new Thor is. 

DC meanwhile, is whitewashing previously mixed race characters, canceling series involving PoCs, and turning Amanda Waller into another male-gaze baiting supermodel.

Thinking about it, Amanda Waller is a perfect example of what I’m talking about. Marvel, to the best of my knowledge, has never had a character like Amanda Waller. A woman of color, clearly not designed to appeal to the male gaze, who was respected and treated as a force to be reckoned with. 

Props to DC for making Amanda Waller in the past, shame on them for what they’re doing with her now.

We love Marvel because of what Marvel is doing NOW, introducing diversity into comics, and then making a lot of noise about it in order to make non white-cis-male readers feel more welcome. We mock DC because we are looking at their current actions. 

This isn’t a question of the company’s past, it’s a question of what the companies are doing right now, and right now DC is regressing to the white-male-dudebro demographic, while Marvel is loudly and publicly trying to change things. 

(via derinthemadscientist)

fuckyesdeadpool:

This offer is only for a month so be quick and read as much as possible FAST

(via schrodingershipster)

why do nerds even fucking care so much about new thor and cap. thor odinson and steve rogers aren’t even fucking “going away” they’re just gonna be in a different comic

missveryvery:

minim-calibre:

beesmygod:

because babies dont have object permanence

DAMN

(Source: pyramidslayer, via derinthemadscientist)

emmafrosticle:

Ms Marvel #6

OH MY GOSH KAMALA <3

(Source: reyesrobbies, via mariusperkins)

stuckinabucket:

thegreatgodum:

sigma7:

saucefactory:

gameraboy:

Marvel Comics is making Thor a woman.  From Time Magazine:

TIME: How do you think this will impact fans who have been with the male version of Thor for such a long time?

Jason Aaron, writer of the Thor series: If you’re a long-time Thor fan you know there’s kind of a tradition from time to time of somebody else picking up that hammer. Beta Ray Bill was a horse-faced alien guy who picked up the hammer. At one point Thor was a frog. So I think if we can accept Thor as a frog and a horse-faced alien, we should be able to accept a woman being able to pick up that hammer and wield it for a while, which surprisingly we’ve never really seen before.

Time: Marvel Comics Writers Explain Why They’re Making Thor a Woman

WELL DONE, MARVEL! I’m saddened that they have to explain why they’re making Thor a woman, though. It’s not like they’d have to explain the existence of a male character.

Actually I’m (honestly) a little confused, and the examples Aaron sited don’t help.  Beta Ray Bill was a different character.  Frog Thor was the same character who currently wields the hammer, but in pog frog form.  I’m assuming this is more of the Beta Ray Bill/Thunderstrike variety of another worthy of lifting the hammer does so and not a matter of the character who currently wields it being changed.  If you follow me.  But while I approve of the non-sexist nomenclature (seriously, the “She-” can be retired any day), it makes it a little hard to keep straight, if this Thor and other Thor are separate characters….

I’m kinda curious about the mechanism in play, but seriously, this isn’t the most WTFery thing Marvel has done this month.  I can’t understand getting riled up about it.

Wait, wasn’t Frog!Thor actually a frog that found a chip off mjolnir and became Thor?

There are/were actually two Frog!Thors, it looks like.  One was Thor as a frog.  The other one’s a frog that’s running around with a chip off Mjolnir and the appropriate Mjolnir-wielding get-up.  Comics: serious business.

Two frog!thors.

Two

Frog

Thors.

And we’re arguing about if woman!Thor is acceptable.

Tags: smh comics thor

derinthemadscientist:

craftastrophies:

derinthemadscientist:

fourofthem:

mainlydc:

"Give me the muzzle."

#how dare this comic be not horrible 

Her clothing still pisses me off so much

But this is adorable

Why… why are her pants undone??

BECAUSE NEW 52 HARLEY DOESN’T NEED CLOTHES

I mean she used to wear a full-body harlequin suit with thick makeup so literally all you could see were her eyes and hair

But now we’re GRITTY and MATURE

That aside I do love this whole pregnancy subplot

I don’t even mind the cutoffs and skimpy whatevers.

BUT DO YOUR SHORTS UP dear god. 

Also, ‘gritty and mature’ is Harley Quinn on opposite day and I don’t like it.

derinthemadscientist:

fourofthem:

mainlydc:

"Give me the muzzle."

#how dare this comic be not horrible 

Her clothing still pisses me off so much

But this is adorable

Why… why are her pants undone??