fursasaida:

bluelightseven:

abundantlyqueer:

so, obviously, a universe of this ^^^

but, in terms of actual tactics, i’ve found that when this kind of thing happens in a store, responding quite loudly with “oh, i don’t work here” (no matter what the opening salvo was) is weirdly effective in making them doubletake and then sidle off.

it came out of this: a million years ago i was having dinner in a rather rowdy bar/restaurant with the guy i was sort of seeing at the time. and there was a group of six or eight guys at a table behind us who were being outrageously obnoxious to their two waitresses, in that special bared-teeth friendly way that makes it clear the only thing keeping these guys’ dicks in their pants is nonsense like The Law.

anyhow, myself and my date are rolling our eyes and smiling sympathetically at the waitresses as they pass back and forth being as professional and pleasant as possible under live fire. i get up to go to the bathroom, which is past the table of apes behind us. they’re busy harassing a waitress and don’t even see me go by, but when i come out again, they’re between waitresses. i’m wearing jeans - which is what the wait staff of the restaurant wear too. as i walk past their table to mine, a guy on an outside seat PATS MY ASS and says, ‘we’re ready for dessert, darling’.

and yeah. it’s possible that i’d have reacted the same way if i was alone, but the fact was, i had the kind of freedom of action that comes with knowing you’ve got a six foot two, hundred and eighty pound royal marine lieutenant as backup, and he’s watching from twelve feet away.

so i planted one hand on the table and the other on the back of this guy’s chair and said loudly something that started ‘i don’t work here. i don’t have to put up with your shit, because it’s not my job. i will, however, make sure that the manager knows his staff are being heroically patient and polite while you’re being a bunch of ignorant fucks, and i’ll complain bitterly about being a paying customer who can’t go to the bathroom without being groped as she passes this table. don’t order dessert, you’re about to be asked to leave.’

there’s a special silence that falls when an entire restaurant is listening to one person talk. it’s awesome.

anyhoo. the point of that was, the second i said ‘i don’t work here’, their entire demeanor changed. they had a distinct sense of the power gap, and i tipped it over. the same statement, made loudly and forcefully in any faintly applicable setting, sort of reminds the man that you, as a customer, are at least nominally in a privileged position. it reminds him that paid staff have an obligation to be receptive, you don’t. it also, i think, implies that you don’t understand what response he’s looking for. women know that the galling thing about these ambushes is that we’re trained not to shut them down as rudely and directly as we need to. the ‘i don’t work here’ isn’t rude, it’s a statement of fact, and perfectly polite if the other person is under a misapprehension (it happens me all the time in clothes shops – i worked clothing retail for years, and people see me rifling one handed through jeans tags and say ‘oh, do you have this in stock in a twelve?’ all the freaking time. and i say ‘oh, i don’t work here’ and that’s not remotely rude or brusque or anything). so, it sort of puts the guy on the wrong foot because now it seems like you think he’s mistaken you in your hat and coat for a sales person. and he can either say ‘oh, sorry’ and sidle off in confusion, or he can say ‘i know’, and then you (acting as if you can’t even compute what his ‘i know’ implies) get to point to the nearest sales person and say ‘but he does. go and ask him’.

 

next week in Defend the Food Service Staff at All Costs, They Serve the Food: the time i walked out of a dinner date at a FANTASTIC restaurant BEFORE DESSERT because my date thought being condescending to the waitress would impress me, aka, The Toughest Choice I Ever Made in Support of Another Woman.

APPLAUSE.GIF

This is wonderful. I really urge people to click back through the previous reblogs that aren’t shown here, because they have AWESOME commentary as well.

I’ve been using the ‘but, I don’t understand?’ tactic lately, with sexist/racist jokes and general inappropriateness. It works SURPRISINGLY well. The galling thing to me about shit like this is that everyoneknowsit’s not ok, and they do it anyway. ‘Misunderstanding’ what they are doing means they have to either back right off, or admit to being a terrible person. (Note, I would not do this if I were somewhere, or with someone, that I felt was unsafe. I realise not everyone gets the social capital and security to do this.) It works especially well with that one friend who likes to tell racist jokes ‘just for shock value’. It is NOT the response they want.

Also, there are a few dudes in my (very very dodgy) neighbourhood who will cross the road at night, so that they are walking on the other side of the road, not right behind me. I wish I could tell them how much I appreciate it. There are also dudes who approach me outside my house and ask if I live alone, they’ve seen me around, etc. Uh, what is THAT about? Uncool.

(Source: missvoltairine)

dresdencodak:

Why Cleavage is Bad for Crimefighting

thefremen:

fromonesurvivortoanother:

…specifically in reference to the Elevatorgate thing. And this guy came along and said he didnt think it was sexist. So I replied that if women and feminists (I.e., those who deal with and live with the issue) think it’s sexist, then it’s sexist. So…

rosalarian:

thesavagesalad:

Liberating Super-man by *RobinRone
HERE HAVE THIS GLORIOUS PICTURE TO ACCOMPANY YOU WHILST YOU READ THIS FLAWLESS ARTICLE

Steel buns.
"barbeauxbot: How media clearly reflects the sexism and the racism we cannot see in ourselves.
karnythia: isitis: bana05: I wanted my first-year film students to understand what happens to a story when actual human beings inhabit your characters, and the way they can inspire storytelling. And I wanted to teach them how to look at headshots and what you might be able to tell from a headshot. So for the past few years I’ve done a small experiment with them.
Some troubling shit always occurs.
It works like this: I bring in my giant file of head shots, which include actors of all races, sizes, shapes, ages, and experience levels. Each student picks a head shot from the stack and gets a few minutes to sit with the person’s face and then make up a little story about them. Namely, for white men, they have no trouble coming up with an entire history, job, role, genre, time, place, and costume. They will often identify him without prompting as “the main character.” The only exception? “He would play the gay guy.” For white women, they mostly do not come up with a job (even though it was specifically asked for), and they will identify her by her relationships. “She would play the mom/wife/love interest/best friend.” I’ve heard “She would play the slut” or “She would play the hot girl.” A lot more than once.
For nonwhite men, it can be equally depressing. “He’s in a buddy cop movie, but he’s not the main guy, he’s the partner.” “He’d play a terrorist.” “He’d play a drug dealer.” “A thug.” “A hustler.” “Homeless guy.” One Asian actor was promoted to “villain.”
For nonwhite women (grab onto something sturdy, like a big glass of strong liquor), sometimes they are “lucky” enough to be classified as the girlfriend/love interest/mom, but I have also heard things like “Well, she’d be in a romantic comedy, but as the friend, you know?” “Maid.” “Prostitute.” “Drug addict.”
I should point out that the responses are similar whether the group is all or mostly-white or extremely racially mixed, and all the groups I’ve tried this with have been about equally balanced between men and women, though individual responses vary. Women do a little better with women, and people of color do a little better with people of color, but female students sometimes forget to come up with a job for female actors and black male students sometimes tell the class that their black male actor wouldn’t be the main guy.
Once the students have made their pitches, we interrogate their opinions. “You seem really sure that he’s not the main character – why? What made you automatically say that?” “You said she was a mom. Was she born a mom, or did she maybe do something else with her life before her magic womb opened up and gave her an identity? Who is she as a person?” In the case of the “thug“, it turns out that the student was just reading off his film resume. This brilliant African American actor who regularly brings houses down doing Shakespeare on the stage and more than once made me weep at the beauty and subtlety of his performances, had a list of film credits that just said “Thug #4.” “Gang member.” “Muscle.” Because that’s the film work he can get. Because it puts food on his table.
So, the first time I did this exercise, I didn’t know that it would turn into a lesson on racism, sexism, and every other kind of -ism. I thought it was just about casting. But now I know that casting is never just about casting, and this day is a real teachable opportunity. Because if we do this right, we get to the really awkward silence, where the (now mortified) students try to sink into their chairs. Because, hey, most of them are proud Obama voters! They have been raised by feminist moms! They don’t want to be or see themselves as being racist or sexist. But their own racism and sexism is running amok in the room, and it’s awkward. This for every time someone criticizes how characters of color and female characters of color especially are treated in text and by subsequent fandoms. It’s never “just a television/movie/book”. It’s never been ”just”. THIS But representation doesn’t matter in post-racial America. Or something. The media that gets made teaches people to discriminate in theory & in reality. Representation matters. And not just in front of the camera, but every step of the creative process. Tokenism is not a solution, it’s a bandaid."

cone sold stober:   (via mymilkspilt)

(Source: letthetruthlaugh, via mymilkspilt)

nudiemuse:

cunthulhu:

pixiemoon42:

dwntotheundrgrnd:

thatqueeryoungbuck:

miseryxchord:

Queer Porn Star Accused of Pedophilia for Breastfeeding Baby

By Diane Anderson-Minshall

Weeks after queer porn star Madison Young had her baby, she created an art exhibit titled “Becoming MILF.” The concept, according to Jezebel.com, was to explore how Young now embodies a contradiction, the dichotomy to end all dichotomies — that of the Madonna and the whore. At the show’s opening, she served up self-made breast-milk shakes and displayed a baby quilt made of burp cloths and porn star panties. Turns out not every feminist porn star agrees. According to Salon.com, a series of sex worker Twitter wars ensued, the controversy tapping into “culture-wide mommy issues.”

Porn star Furry Girl (who is known for her, um, stage name–like features) criticized Young for publicly breast-feeding, tweeting that only “creeps and pedophiles” are interested in seeing a porn star breast-feed and insinuated that exposing her child to such an audience was abusive. Girl called Young a “a revolting person” and dubbed her defenders “baby fetishists” and “pedos.”

Of course Young (née Tina Butcher) is already a well-known feminist porn star, director, author, and the founder of Femina Potens, an ever-evolving, queer and trans nonprofit gallery and performance space in California that the San Francisco Chronicle calls “the most happening art space in the city; a revolution in art and sex.” She’s curated the gallery for years, mixing envelope-pushing women’s sexuality exhibitions and spoken word shows from lesbians like Annie Sprinkle with less kinky feminist projects from literati like Michelle Tea. Young’s shown up on such outlets as IFC and the History Channel and in MSNBC’s Brian Alexander’s book America Unzipped, which has a whole chapter on her art and work.

So what was this controversial display of pedophilia that Furry Girl imagines? According to Salon, Young posed for a black-and-white photograph dressed up like Marilyn Monroe while clutching her daughter to her bare breast, nonchalantly breast-fed on a video, and then announced that she would nurse live and in person at an upcoming event meant to promote “health awareness for our queer, kinky, and sex positive communities.”

At the event itself, Young discussed breast health, while other presenters talked about breast cancer, antiretroviral drugs, and safe sex. “It wasn’t a sex party; it was an adult sex-ed class hosted by sex workers,” writes Salon’s Tracy Clark-Florey.

Furry Girl, an actress in vegan porn, tweeted that context is at the root of her argument, though she no longer wants to comment on the debacle. Meanwhile, Young returned to social media in hopes of ending the Twitter mommy sex wars: “The only one sexualizing this image of me breastfeeding is you. Which makes me feel truly disgusted and violated.”

Our society is seriously screwed up in sexualizing a female body’s parts that are being used in a way they’re meant to function, to the point it feels it needs to control and limit their use for that function, based on the last couple generations being indoctrinated to believe that babies should drink formula because it’s healthier, because breasts = sex toys, therefore breastfeeding = dirty.

Madison Young is a personal hero of mine and this exhibition and the talk surrounding it makes me perversely excited about the possible conversations that this will generate on an academic level (sex education- sex workers- the intersection of porn and motherhood- the whore and the madonna- the woman and the lady- mother and child- spectacle and the private- social media and personal relationships-)

but on a more personal level it bothers me that people are making one dimensional statements about Madison and what she is trying to achieve- for me she is actually delving into more complex systems of gender, power, relationships surrounding women and how these are still areas of controversy. 

still i think i’m actually going to write more about this later on-sies- hopefully post it somewhere

I enjoy all of this commentary. And agree with it. I also hate that female breasts in general are made to be so sexual while male breasts are not. Women are made sexual objects, their bodies are made objects so when a child is involved (even though in this case it is about are and NUTRITION), it becomes pedophelia.

People irritate me.

WHAT THE FUCK?!?!

I really like what i’ve seen from Madison Young, and this is dumb shit. 

I watched this unfold on Twitter when it happened. I used to support some of Furrygirl’s work but this was so awful. So awful. I can’t support anything someone who is okay to attack people straight up like that does. A lot of her tweets were ad hominem attacks on people and just disgusting to me.

The things she said to anyone disagreeing with her statements were sick and ugly. I was so sad.

I get the initial reaction. A couple of times last summer I saw little kids running around naked and thought ‘oh! No!’

And then I thought, well, THAT’S fucked up. That my first thought is naked = sex. Even on a two year old.

That is not ok. Look, guys, I was felt up as a kid, I am so totally not ok with paedophilia (not that you have to have been felt up to not be ok with it, jeez). But you know what else i’m not ok with? A society where we pre-suppose sexuality where there is none. Where innocents - women, men, children, everyone else - have to adjust their behaviour to not be blamed for the horrifying actions of a few.

HOW is this a problem, but Bratz dolls are not sexualising kids. A boob is FOR FEEDING BABIES. It also happens to be well sexy. But it’s not like the minute someone becomes a mother, they are Pure and/or Frumpy, and therefore not sexual.

It makes me so MAD.

(Source: advocate.com)

Dressed to Kill

rosalarian:

Whenever I complain about how females are portrayed in mainstream superhero comics, inevitably half a dozen people pop up to tell me this:

“Men are idealized in comics, too.”

Yes. Yes they are. I am aware of this. While I think the idealism is harmful, that isn’t actually what I have a problem with. (Well, not the main thing.) Because while the men are impossibly muscular and the women are impossibly skinny/boobular, the men aren’t being sexualized out the wazoo.

It’s not the characters’ bodies themselves that are the biggest problem, but how they are dressed and posed. Tits out, ass out, lips pouty, legs spread, hips cocked, eyelids at half mast. Outfits that make Wonder Woman’s star spangled panties look fit for a Mormon picnic. Short skirts, cutouts, stilettos, fishnets, thigh-highs. I’m not describing Playboy here.

You don’t see male heroes wearing these costumes or posing like this. Outside of statistical outliers like Namor, their costumes tend to have full coverage, and when they pose, it’s to inspire fear, not boners.

To prove my point, I spent yesterday morning creating this:

Looks pretty ridiculous. You would never see this as a serious illustration. Comic fans would be in an uproar. Way too much man-ass. And you know he’s not going to be graceful on those heels. And why is he looking back with a come-hither look?

You might be thinking that I drew him extra sexy, just to prove my point. Well, perhaps you’d like to see the source image:

Yeah, I literally drew Man Canary right on top of her. (*snicker*) I drew Black Canary’s skeletal position, then added the idealized male superhero physique over top. See, it really isn’t his muscles that are freaking you out. It’s the fishnets doing their best to contain those man cheeks.

And it’s not just heroines who deal with this:

(Compare to original)

I feel uncomfortable looking at this. And also, perplexed. How is that costume staying on? I know most comic artists don’t have much experience with real-world fashion, but let me tell you, double sided tape does not work all that well in combat situations.

I get that some of these characters are “using their sexuality to blind men so they can attack them,” and I bet that could be an effective attack. But there are so many chicks doing this that even the dumbest, most weak-willed superhero/villain is going to catch on eventually.

And lest you think DC is all alone in this, I present you with this little gem:

(Compare to source)

SO MUCH BULGING MAN PELVIS!!! For everyone!

I actually had a lot of fun with this one. Most of the characters are actually pretty covered up. But between Black Cat’s absurd front zipper and her pose, yeah, it’s ridiculous.

There were so many more images I could have parodied, but I got tired of spending so much time rendering man ass.

Dudes, I want you to imagine a world where most of the portrayals of your gender in comics look like the above. Are you going to think “Well, I really like the stories so I’ll just suck it up and read this anyway”? Or are you going to be alienated from reading most comics? Be honest. Are you willing to stare at that much thrusting crotch just to find out if Spiderman is gonna win?

Lots of people in the comics business look at their demographic breakdown and think women don’t like superheroes. The creator of DC Women Kicking Ass made a very apt point when she said, “Let me put it this way, if you keep keeping putting food on a kid’s plate and they don’t eat you do you assume they don’t like to eat or they don’t like the food? Right.”

Women like comics. And not just flowery manga and autobio stuff. We like superheroes.

I don’t have a problem with cheesecake, and I don’t have a problem with lady-flesh. (I make a fair amount of money drawing lesbian porn.) But there’s a time and a place for it. Unless you are specifically going out of your way to create porn comics, stop putting porn in comics. Stop using Playboy for anatomy references! (I wish I was kidding about that.)

Now, there will still be many of you who are unconvinced, who think us ladies are making a big deal out of nothing, that this is trivial. Many of you will bring up examples of female superheroes who are covered up, non-sexualized, and non-idealized. I’m not denying that those characters exist, and that there are several. But there are still far too many female characters more concerned with showing- off ass, rather than kicking it.

Just stumbled across this again. Always bears a reblog.

I think the group is my favourite. So much thrusting! They’ll ruin their backs doing that kind of thing.

rjmakes:

bumblingb:

zenis:

notcuddles:

rjmakes:

(picture snipped: a thin white woman with white hair in a white and pink corset and bunny ears wraps her arms around an unconscious Batman. A pink smoke/glitter forms a heart behind her.)


…what the fuck is this

I mean, I get that it’s a new Batman villain, and that she’s some kind of sexy lady, and that her name is The White Rabbit, and she wears bunny ears and some kind of corset/underpants, and she’s a reference to Alice In Wonderland. Let me tell you: sexy lady Alice In Wonderland motifs? A white woman with giant breasts in a corset and bunny ears? A female villain whose tantalizing sexuality is part of her evil power/demeanor of evil? DC is breaking radical new ground here.

I kind of want to go to Baltimore Comiccon and harrass the people at the DC panel about this.  Like, really?  This is the best they can come up with to save their dying company?  No wonder sales are tanking if this is the level of creativity at DC today.

>New villain is a Playboy Bunny

Oh. I also enjoy she has her ass out, is CODDLING BATMAN who I assume she just beat up, and looking all submissive and sex and gazing at the viewer like she really IS on the cover of Playboy. Of course, if she were a male villain, she’d actually, you know, look domineering and dominating and intimidating, and not like a fucking pinup girl.

I swear, this looks like one of those parodies of female villains/heroes, BUT NO, IT’S FUCKING REAL. 

On top of all that, with the Batman verse, look; We already have Catwoman, a sexy lady; Poison Ivy, oh look another sexy lady; And  Harley, yet another sexy lady who is now even MORE over-sexualized in the revamp. Seriously, what’s with all the fucking corsets?

Oh, and also; An Alice In Wonderland motif? Really? 

The combination of the collar, the zipper up her breasts, and the corset says ‘Choking danger’ to me. 

Yeah, I can’t even fathom what the function is of the zipper that goes up past her corset. And I concur about the posing and expression - it reminds me of Jess Fink’s post on the sexualization of superheros/villains. This cover gives the impression that the story within is 100% sex and 0% crimefighting.

Tags: comics sexism