rule63rules:

[Image: A portion of a comic page. In the first panel, two people, presumably women, say, “I mean, what if there were superheroes who had the same qualities as superheroines? Wouldn’t that be awesome?” “Totally! Like, what if superhero costumes accentuated the masculine sexual characteristics in a way that made no sense for fighting!” In the next panel they turn their heads, leading to the third panel, where a hyper-muscled Superman-esque figure stands in radiant light, wearing a skin-tight costume that exposes one arm and half of his hairy chest while creating a hilariously revealing sling for his bulge.]

Oh god. My EYES.

rule63rules:

[Image: A portion of a comic page. In the first panel, two people, presumably women, say, “I mean, what if there were superheroes who had the same qualities as superheroines? Wouldn’t that be awesome?” “Totally! Like, what if superhero costumes accentuated the masculine sexual characteristics in a way that made no sense for fighting!” In the next panel they turn their heads, leading to the third panel, where a hyper-muscled Superman-esque figure stands in radiant light, wearing a skin-tight costume that exposes one arm and half of his hairy chest while creating a hilariously revealing sling for his bulge.]

Oh god. My EYES.

Why can’t rule 63 girls wear pants?

superlayne:

Is there some law that they have to be in shorts or skirts?

And also they seem to have long hair a lot? I guess to emphasise the femme-ness of them, which I can see the logic of but makes me cranky.

(via rule63rules)